← Match Finder
Championship
Referee: M Oliver
Nott'm Forest
S S T U S
1–2
Full-time

Retrospective analysis — the model is trained only on matches played before this one.

🔒 Who wins? Pro

The model's probabilities for a home win, draw and away win — with reasoning and recommended markets.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Team trends

Nott'm Forest Sheffield United
Last 6 — all competitions · 6/6 matches
Win Ø 59%
67%
50%
Points per game
2,2
1,7
Over 2.5 Ø 50%
33%
67%
Both score Ø 59%
50%
67%
Average goals
2,3
2,8
Scored
1,7
1,8
Conceded
0,7
1,0
Goal diff per game
+1,0
+0,8
This season — Championship · 46/47 matches
Win Ø 52%
54%
49%
Points per game
1,8
1,7
Over 2.5 Ø 47%
48%
45%
Both score Ø 43%
46%
40%
Average goals
2,5
2,5
Scored
1,6
1,5
Conceded
0,8
1,0
Goal diff per game
+0,8
+0,5
🔒 Goal markets Pro

Expected goals, over/under and both teams to score — priced by the model before kick-off.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

🔒 Most likely result Pro

The model's top final scores with the best bookmaker odds.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Match stats

Half-time score: 1–0

48% Possession 52%
10 Shots 6
1 Shots on target 3
3 Blocked shots 6
4 Goalkeeper saves 3
6 Corners 4
1 Offside 2
11 Free kicks against 11
4 Yellow cards 2
0 Red cards 0
The table before the match Nott'm Forest 4. · Sheffield United 5. ▾
# Team K V U T +/− P
1 Fulham 48 29 9 10 +65 96
2 Bournemouth 48 25 15 8 +35 90
3 Huddersfield 47 24 14 9 +21 86
4 Nott'm Forest 46 25 9 12 +35 84
5 Sheffield United 47 23 10 14 +23 79
6 Luton 48 22 13 13 +12 79
7 Middlesbrough 48 22 10 16 +15 76
8 West Brom 48 20 13 15 +11 73
9 Blackburn 48 20 12 16 +12 72
10 Millwall 48 19 15 14 +10 72
11 Coventry 48 19 13 16 +7 70
12 Preston 48 18 16 14 -2 70
13 Swansea 48 18 13 17 -6 67
14 Stoke 48 18 12 18 +7 66
15 QPR 48 19 9 20 -2 66
16 Blackpool 48 17 12 19 -7 63
17 Bristol City 48 16 11 21 -14 59
18 Derby 48 15 13 20 -8 58
19 Cardiff 48 16 9 23 -14 57
20 Hull 48 15 9 24 -11 54
21 Reading 48 14 9 25 -31 51
22 Birmingham 48 11 15 22 -28 48
23 Peterboro 46 9 10 27 -44 37
24 Peterborough 46 9 10 27 -44 37
25 Barnsley 48 6 13 29 -42 31

Calculated from our results data. “xG +/−” is expected goal difference — a positive number with a low league position suggests an undervalued team. Ties on points are sorted by goal difference; some leagues use other rules.

Match report

Nott'm Forest Sheffield United
1–0 B. Johnson ⚽
S. Surridge
19′
Half-time 1–1
47′
⚽ M. Gibbs-White 1–1
S. Berge
58′
🟨 Jack Robinson
J. Lolley 🔁
↦ P. Zinckernagel
71′
Scott McKenna 🟨
75′
K. Davis 🔁
↦ S. Surridge
75′
75′
⚽ J. Fleck 1–2
G. Baldock
Joe Worrall 🟨
91′
108′
🔁 B. Osborn
↦ G. Baldock
109′
🔁 C. Hourihane
↦ J. Fleck
Steve Cook 🟨
111′
Cafú 🔁
↦ J. Garner
119′
121′
❌ O. Norwood
penalty missed
2–2 B. Johnson ⚽
122′
123′
❌ C. Hourihane
penalty missed
3–2 Cafú ⚽
124′
125′
⚽ S. Berge 3–3
4–3 S. Cook ⚽
126′
127′
⚽ I. Ndiaye 4–4
J. Lolley ❌
penalty missed
128′
129′
❌ M. Gibbs-White
penalty missed
Full-time 4–4

Line-ups

Nott'm Forest

3-4-1-2
30 B. Samba G
27 S. Cook D
26 S. McKenna D
4 J. Worrall D
2 D. Spence M
8 J. Colback M
22 R. Yates M
37 J. Garner M
20 B. Johnson F
11 P. Zinckernagel F
16 S. Surridge F
Bench (7)
23 J. Lolley
9 K. Davis
18 Cafú
14 R. Laryea
3 Tobias Figueiredo
17 A. Mighten
1 E. Horvath

Coach: S. Cooper

Sheffield United

3-4-1-2
18 W. Foderingham G
6 C. Basham D
2 G. Baldock M
19 J. Robinson D
12 J. Egan D
33 R. Norrington-Davies M
4 J. Fleck M
16 O. Norwood M
8 S. Berge F
27 M. Gibbs-White F
29 I. Ndiaye F
Bench (7)
23 B. Osborn
24 C. Hourihane
22 B. Davies
1 A. Davies
25 F. Uremović
32 W. Osula
36 D. Jebbison

Coach: P. Heckingbottom

Odds comparison

Green columns are the outcomes that came in.

1X2
H
2,93
U
3,31
B ✓
2,44
Over/under goals
O1,5 ✓
–
O2,5 ✓
2,02
U2,5
1,79
U3,5 ✓
–
Both teams to score
BLS ja ✓
–
BLS nei
–

Referee

M Oliver · 207 kamper i vår database

🟨 Yellow cards
3,6 / match
Average
⚽ Free kicks
22,3 / match
Average

🟥 Red cards: 0,14 per match

The analysis is a statistical estimate based on the teams' results and underlying performances (xG) — not a guarantee. See the model's results.