← Match Finder
Premier League
Referee: J Gillett
Nott'm Forest
T T T T U
0–2
Full-time
Tottenham
T T U T S

Retrospective analysis — the model is trained only on matches played before this one.

🔒 Who wins? Pro

The model's probabilities for a home win, draw and away win — with reasoning and recommended markets.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Team trends

Nott'm Forest Tottenham
Last 6 — all competitions · 6/6 matches
Win Ø 17%
17%
17%
Points per game
0,7
0,7
Over 2.5 Ø 75%
50%
100%
Both score Ø 75%
50%
100%
Average goals
3,3
4,2
Scored
1,2
1,8
Conceded
2,2
2,3
Goal diff per game
-1,0
-0,5
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
This season — Premier League · 16/16 matches
Win Ø 38%
19%
56%
Points per game
0,9
1,9
Over 2.5 Ø 63%
50%
75%
Both score Ø 66%
56%
75%
Average goals
2,8
3,5
Scored
1,1
2,1
Conceded
1,8
1,4
Goal diff per game
-0,7
+0,6
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
🔒 Goal markets Pro

Expected goals, over/under and both teams to score — priced by the model before kick-off.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

🔒 Most likely result Pro

The model's top final scores with the best bookmaker odds.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Match stats

Half-time score: 0–1

1,35 xG 1,57
33% Possession 67%
15 Shots 12
1 Shots on target 6
6 Blocked shots 4
4 Goalkeeper saves 1
6 Corners 4
5 Offside 0
16 Free kicks against 11
2 Yellow cards 4
0 Red cards 1
The table before the match Nott'm Forest 17. · Tottenham 5.
# Team K V U T +/− xG +/− P
1 Liverpool 16 11 4 1 +21 +12.7 37
2 Arsenal 16 11 3 2 +18 +17.3 36
3 Aston Villa 16 11 2 3 +15 +7.0 35
4 Man City 16 10 3 3 +20 +16.2 33
5 Tottenham 16 9 3 4 +10 +0.5 30
6 Man United 16 9 0 7 -3 -1.4 27
7 Newcastle 16 8 2 6 +12 +10.1 26
8 Brighton 16 7 5 4 +5 +4.4 26
9 West Ham 16 7 3 6 -4 -5.5 24
10 Everton 16 7 2 7 +0 +4.4 23
11 Fulham 16 6 3 7 +0 -6.2 21
12 Brentford 16 5 4 7 +1 +8.9 19
13 Chelsea 16 5 4 7 +0 +6.7 19
14 Wolves 16 5 4 7 -5 -6.7 19
15 Bournemouth 16 5 4 7 -9 -5.7 19
16 Crystal Palace 16 4 4 8 -8 -2.6 16
17 Nott'm Forest 16 3 5 8 -11 -7.1 14
18 Luton 16 2 3 11 -15 -19.0 9
19 Burnley 16 2 2 12 -18 -13.1 8
20 Sheffield United 16 2 2 12 -29 -21.0 8

Calculated from our results data. “xG +/−” is expected goal difference — a positive number with a low league position suggests an undervalued team. Ties on points are sorted by goal difference; some leagues use other rules.

Match report

Nott'm Forest Tottenham
32′
🔁 O. Skipp
↦ B. Johnson
42′
🟨 Destiny Udogie
Half-time 0–1
47′
Richarlison 0–1
D. Kulusevski
54′
🟨 Pape Matar Sarr
Anthony Elanga ℹ️
VAR: Goal cancelled
60′
65′
D. Kulusevski 0–2
C. Wood 🔁
↦ W. Boly
67′
Danilo 🔁
↦ C. Kouyaté
67′
69′
ℹ️ Yves Bissouma
VAR: Card upgrade
70′
🟥 Yves Bissouma
72′
🔁 P. Højbjerg
↦ Richarlison
73′
🟨 Ben Davies
79′
🟨 Heung-min Son
Murillo 🟨
82′
C. Hudson-Odoi 🔁
↦ O. Mangala
83′
88′
🔁 Emerson Royal
↦ Son Heung-Min
Harry Toffolo 🟨
90′
99′
🔁 A. Véliz
↦ D. Kulusevski
Full-time 0–2

Line-ups

Nott'm Forest

3-5-2
1 M. Turner G
30 W. Boly D
40 Murillo D
19 M. Niakhaté D
7 N. Williams M
22 R. Yates M
5 O. Mangala M
8 C. Kouyaté M
15 H. Toffolo M
21 A. Elanga F
10 M. Gibbs-White F
Bench (9)
11 C. Wood
28 Danilo
14 C. Hudson-Odoi
23 O. Vlachodimos
16 N. Domínguez
32 A. Omobamidele
27 D. Origi
43 O. Aina
29 G. Montiel

Coach: S. Cooper

Tottenham

4-2-3-1
13 G. Vicario G
23 Pedro Porro D
17 C. Romero D
33 B. Davies D
38 D. Udogie D
29 P. Sarr M
8 Y. Bissouma M
22 B. Johnson M
21 D. Kulusevski M
7 Son Heung-Min M
9 Richarlison F
Bench (9)
4 O. Skipp
5 P. Højbjerg
12 Emerson Royal
36 A. Véliz
65 A. Dorrington
20 F. Forster
63 J. Donley
15 E. Dier
11 Bryan Gil

Coach: A. Postecoglou

Odds comparison

Green columns are the outcomes that came in.

1X2
H
4,52
U
4,13
B ✓
1,74
Over/under goals
O1,5 ✓
O2,5
1,63
U2,5 ✓
2,32
U3,5 ✓
Both teams to score
BLS ja
BLS nei ✓

Referee

J Gillett · 178 kamper i vår database

🟨 Yellow cards
3,5 / match
Average
⚽ Free kicks
21,1 / match
Average

🟥 Red cards: 0,07 per match

The analysis is a statistical estimate based on the teams' results and underlying performances (xG) — not a guarantee. See the model's results.