← Match Finder
Serie A
Referee: F Fourneau
Como
U U T U S
3–1
Full-time
Lecce
U T S S T

Retrospective analysis — the model is trained only on matches played before this one.

🔒 Who wins? Pro

The model's probabilities for a home win, draw and away win — with reasoning and recommended markets.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Team trends

Como Lecce
Last 6 — all competitions · 6/6 matches
Win Ø 33%
33%
33%
Points per game
1,5
1,2
Over 2.5 Ø 25%
33%
17%
Both score Ø 42%
67%
17%
Average goals
2,2
1,5
Scored
1,3
0,7
Conceded
0,8
0,8
Goal diff per game
+0,5
-0,2
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
This season — Serie A · 26/26 matches
Win Ø 35%
46%
23%
Points per game
1,7
0,9
Over 2.5 Ø 35%
38%
31%
Both score Ø 35%
38%
31%
Average goals
2,3
1,9
Scored
1,6
0,7
Conceded
0,7
1,3
Goal diff per game
+0,8
-0,6
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
🔒 Goal markets Pro

Expected goals, over/under and both teams to score — priced by the model before kick-off.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

🔒 Most likely result Pro

The model's top final scores with the best bookmaker odds.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Match stats

Half-time score: 3–1

3,29 xG 0,24
69% Possession 31%
12 Shots 5
7 Shots on target 2
2 Blocked shots 2
1 Goalkeeper saves 3
5 Corners 1
1 Offside 2
15 Free kicks against 12
0 Yellow cards 1
0 Red cards 0
The table before the match Como 6. · Lecce 18. ▾
# Team K V U T +/− xG +/− P
1 Inter 26 21 1 4 +41 +33.0 64
2 Milan 26 15 9 2 +21 +14.2 54
3 Roma 26 16 2 8 +18 +10.3 50
4 Napoli 26 15 5 6 +12 +8.3 50
5 Juventus 26 13 7 6 +18 +22.9 46
6 Como 26 12 9 5 +22 +16.6 45
7 Atalanta 26 12 9 5 +14 +9.2 45
8 Bologna 26 10 6 10 +3 +0.3 36
9 Sassuolo 26 10 5 11 -3 -7.6 35
10 Lazio 26 8 10 8 +1 -8.3 34
11 Parma 27 8 9 10 -12 -14.6 33
12 Udinese 26 9 5 12 -11 -7.3 32
13 Cagliari 27 7 9 11 -7 -13.5 30
14 Genoa 26 6 9 11 -5 -0.7 27
15 Torino 26 7 6 13 -22 -10.0 27
16 Fiorentina 26 5 9 12 -9 +5.2 24
17 Cremonese 26 5 9 12 -15 -16.2 24
18 Lecce 26 6 6 14 -16 -17.4 24
19 Pisa 26 1 12 13 -23 -15.3 15
20 Verona 26 2 9 15 -27 -9.1 15

Calculated from our results data. “xG +/−” is expected goal difference — a positive number with a low league position suggests an undervalued team. Ties on points are sorted by goal difference; some leagues use other rules.

Match report

Como Lecce
13′
⚽ L. Coulibaly 0–1
L. Banda
1–1 A. Douvikas ⚽
J. Rodriguez
18′
2–1 J. Rodriguez ⚽
M. Perrone
35′
3–1 M. O. Kempf ⚽
L. Da Cunha
44′
Half-time 3–1
Diego Carlos 🔁
↦ M. O. Kempf
46′
46′
🔁 S. Pierotti
↦ C. Ndaba
59′
🔁 N. Stulic
↦ W. Cheddira
59′
🔁 O. Ngom
↦ O. Gandelman
S. Roberto 🔁
↦ M. Perrone
64′
N. Paz 🔁
↦ M. Vojvoda
64′
70′
🟨 Lameck Banda
73′
🔁 R. Sottil
↦ L. Banda
A. Morata 🔁
↦ A. Douvikas
77′
A. Diao 🔁
↦ J. Rodriguez
84′
84′
🔁 G. Jean
↦ Tiago Gabriel
Full-time 3–1

Line-ups

Como

4-2-3-1
1 J. Butez G
77 I. Van der Brempt D
14 J. Ramon D
2 M. O. Kempf D
18 A. Moreno D
23 M. Perrone M
33 L. Da Cunha M
31 M. Vojvoda M
6 M. Caqueret M
17 J. Rodriguez M
11 A. Douvikas F
Bench (13)
21 N. Tornqvist
22 M. Vigorito
44 N. Cavlina
3 A. Valle
5 E. Goldaniga
7 A. Morata
8 S. Roberto
10 N. Paz
15 A. Lahdo
19 N. Kuhn
28 I. Smolcic
34 Diego Carlos
38 A. Diao

Coach: Cesc Fabregas

Lecce

3-5-1-1
30 W. Falcone G
5 J. Siebert D
44 Tiago Gabriel D
3 C. Ndaba D
17 D. Veiga M
20 Y. Ramadani M
29 L. Coulibaly M
19 L. Banda M
25 A. Gallo M
16 O. Gandelman F
99 W. Cheddira F
Bench (13)
1 C. Fruchtl
32 J. Samooja
6 A. Sala
8 S. Fofana
9 N. Stulic
11 K. Ndri
13 M. Perez
14 T. J. Helgason
18 G. Jean
23 R. Sottil
36 F. Marchwinski
50 S. Pierotti
79 O. Ngom

Coach: Eusebio Di Francesco

Odds comparison

Green columns are the outcomes that came in.

1X2
H ✓
1,37
U
4,49
B
9,12
Over/under goals
O1,5 ✓
–
O2,5 ✓
1,96
U2,5
1,80
O3,5 ✓
–
Both teams to score
BLS ja ✓
–
BLS nei
–

Referee

F Fourneau · 86 kamper i vår database

🟨 Yellow cards
4,8 / match
Above average
⚽ Free kicks
27,1 / match
Above average

🟥 Red cards: 0,20 per match

The analysis is a statistical estimate based on the teams' results and underlying performances (xG) — not a guarantee. See the model's results.