← Match Finder
Championship
Referee: Adam Herczeg
Birmingham
U U T S U
2–2
Full-time
Wolves
U S S S T
🔒 Who wins? Pro

The model's probabilities for a home win, draw and away win — with reasoning and recommended markets.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Team trends

Birmingham Wolves
Last 6 — all competitions · 6/6 matches
Win Ø 50%
33%
67%
Points per game
1,5
2,2
Over 2.5 Ø 67%
50%
83%
Both score Ø 67%
67%
67%
Average goals
2,8
4,0
Scored
1,2
2,7
Conceded
1,7
1,3
Goal diff per game
-0,5
+1,3
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
This season — Championship · 4/4 matches
Win Ø 38%
25%
50%
Points per game
1,5
1,8
Over 2.5 Ø 75%
50%
100%
Both score Ø 88%
75%
100%
Average goals
2,3
4,8
Scored
1,3
2,8
Conceded
1,0
2,0
Goal diff per game
+0,3
+0,8
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
🔒 Goal markets Pro

Expected goals, over/under and both teams to score — priced by the model before kick-off.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

🔒 Most likely result Pro

The model's top final scores with the best bookmaker odds.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Match stats

Half-time score: 2–2

1,41 xG 1,95
53% Possession 47%
15 Shots 10
5 Shots on target 4
5 Blocked shots 1
2 Goalkeeper saves 6
8 Corners 4
2 Offside 2
17 Free kicks against 12
2 Yellow cards 1
0 Red cards 0
The table before the match Birmingham 12. · Wolves 10.
# Team K V U T +/− xG +/− P
1 Swansea 5 3 2 0 +6 +1.4 11
2 Middlesbrough 5 3 1 1 +3 +3.4 10
3 QPR 5 3 1 1 +3 +2.0 10
4 Bristol City 5 3 1 1 +2 -4.2 10
5 West Brom 5 3 1 1 +2 -1.9 10
6 Charlton 5 3 1 1 -1 -4.4 10
7 Millwall 5 3 0 2 +2 +2.3 9
8 Southampton 5 2 2 1 +5 +3.1 8
9 West Ham 5 2 2 1 +4 +0.5 8
10 Wolves 4 2 1 1 +3 +3.9 7
11 Wrexham 5 1 3 1 +2 +1.6 6
12 Birmingham 4 1 3 0 +1 +1.2 6
13 Norwich 5 2 0 3 +0 +0.4 6
14 Stoke 5 2 0 3 -1 -1.7 6
15 Portsmouth 5 2 0 3 -1 -0.2 6
16 Sheffield United 5 1 3 1 -1 -0.5 6
17 Blackburn 5 1 2 2 -1 -3.3 5
18 Watford 5 1 2 2 -2 -1.5 5
19 Lincoln 5 1 2 2 -2 +0.4 5
20 Derby 5 1 1 3 -5 -2.6 4
21 Bolton 5 1 1 3 -5 -1.1 4
22 Cardiff 5 0 3 2 -3 +0.8 3
23 Preston 5 1 0 4 -5 +0.8 3
24 Burnley 5 0 2 3 -6 -0.4 2

Calculated from our results data. “xG +/−” is expected goal difference — a positive number with a low league position suggests an undervalued team. Ties on points are sorted by goal difference; some leagues use other rules.

Match report

Birmingham Wolves
3′
Fer López 0–1
Rodrigo Gomes
1–1 Jay Stansfield
Patrick Roberts
22′
31′
Ladislav Krejčí 1–2
André
1–3 Jackson Tchatchoua
own goal
36′
Half-time 1–3
51′
🟨 Marshall Munetsi
Christoph·Klarer 🟨
53′
Phil Neumann 🟨
67′
68′
🔁 Jordan James
↦ Marshall Munetsi
68′
🔁 Mateus Mane
↦ Rodrigo Gomes
Demarai Gray 🔁
↦ Liam Millar
69′
76′
🔁 Thomas Doyle
↦ Raúl Jiménez
Marvin Ducksch 🔁
↦ Jay Stansfield
81′
Carlos Vicente 🔁
↦ Patrick Roberts
81′
Luis Vasquez 🔁
↦ August Priske
81′
87′
🔁 Sean Neave
↦ Adam Armstrong
87′
🔁 Boubacar Traore
↦ André
Ethan Laird 🔁
↦ Demarai Gray
92′
Full-time 1–3

Line-ups

Birmingham

4-2-3-1
1 J. Beadle G
26 B. Osayi-Samuel D
5 P. Neumann D
4 C. Klarer D
20 A. Cochrane D
24 T. Iwata M
8 Paik Seung-Ho M
16 P. Roberts M
28 J. Stansfield M
17 L. Millar M
9 A. Priske F
Bench (9)
33 M. Ducksch
25 K. Lund
21 R. Allsop
2 E. Laird
32 L. Vázquez
10 D. Gray
27 K. Fujimoto
23 D. Fry
7 Carlos Vicente

Coach: C. Davies

Wolves

4-2-3-1
1 José Sá G
38 J. Tchatchoua D
34 N. Djiga D
37 L. Krejčí D
3 Hugo Bueno D
7 André M
5 M. Munetsi M
21 Rodrigo Gomes M
28 Fer López M
10 A. Armstrong M
9 R. Jiménez F
Bench (9)
23 T. Chirewa
20 T. Doyle
8 J. James
33 G. Konan
36 M. Mane
14 S. Neave
24 Toti Gomes
12 B. Traoré
13 João Virgínia

Coach: César Peixoto

Odds comparison

Green columns are the outcomes that came in.

1X2
H
2,87
U ✓
3,24
B
2,41
Over/under goals
O1,5 ✓
1,30
U1,5
3,24
O2,5 ✓
2,06
U2,5
1,71
O3,5 ✓
3,18
U3,5
1,28
Both teams to score
BLS ja ✓
1,71
BLS nei
2,00

Referee

Adam Herczeg · 18 kamper i vår database

🟨 Yellow cards
4,0 / match
Above average
⚽ Free kicks
22,8 / match
Average

🟥 Red cards: 0,17 per match

The analysis is a statistical estimate based on the teams' results and underlying performances (xG) — not a guarantee. See the model's results.