← Match Finder
Championship
Referee: Adam Herczeg
Birmingham
U U T S U
2–2
Full-time
Wolves
U S S S T
🔒 Who wins? Pro

The model's probabilities for a home win, draw and away win — with reasoning and recommended markets.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Team trends

Birmingham Wolves
Last 6 — all competitions · 6/6 matches
Win Ø 50%
33%
67%
Points per game
1,5
2,2
Over 2.5 Ø 67%
50%
83%
Both score Ø 67%
67%
67%
Average goals
2,8
4,0
Scored
1,2
2,7
Conceded
1,7
1,3
Goal diff per game
-0,5
+1,3
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
This season — Championship · 4/4 matches
Win Ø 38%
25%
50%
Points per game
1,5
1,8
Over 2.5 Ø 75%
50%
100%
Both score Ø 88%
75%
100%
Average goals
2,3
4,8
Scored
1,3
2,8
Conceded
1,0
2,0
Goal diff per game
+0,3
+0,8
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
🔒 Goal markets Pro

Expected goals, over/under and both teams to score — priced by the model before kick-off.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

🔒 Most likely result Pro

The model's top final scores with the best bookmaker odds.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Match stats

Half-time score: 2–2

1,41 xG 1,95
53% Possession 47%
15 Shots 10
5 Shots on target 4
5 Blocked shots 1
2 Goalkeeper saves 6
8 Corners 4
2 Offside 2
17 Free kicks against 12
2 Yellow cards 1
0 Red cards 0
The table before the match Birmingham 12. · Wolves 10. ▾
# Team K V U T +/− xG +/− P
1 Swansea 5 3 2 0 +6 +1.4 11
2 Middlesbrough 5 3 1 1 +3 +3.4 10
3 QPR 5 3 1 1 +3 +2.0 10
4 Bristol City 5 3 1 1 +2 -4.2 10
5 West Brom 5 3 1 1 +2 -1.9 10
6 Charlton 5 3 1 1 -1 -4.4 10
7 Millwall 5 3 0 2 +2 +2.3 9
8 Southampton 5 2 2 1 +5 +3.1 8
9 West Ham 5 2 2 1 +4 +0.5 8
10 Wolves 4 2 1 1 +3 +3.9 7
11 Wrexham 5 1 3 1 +2 +1.6 6
12 Birmingham 4 1 3 0 +1 +1.2 6
13 Norwich 5 2 0 3 +0 +0.4 6
14 Stoke 5 2 0 3 -1 -1.7 6
15 Portsmouth 5 2 0 3 -1 -0.2 6
16 Sheffield United 5 1 3 1 -1 -0.5 6
17 Blackburn 5 1 2 2 -1 -3.3 5
18 Watford 5 1 2 2 -2 -1.5 5
19 Lincoln 5 1 2 2 -2 +0.4 5
20 Derby 5 1 1 3 -5 -2.6 4
21 Bolton 5 1 1 3 -5 -1.1 4
22 Cardiff 5 0 3 2 -3 +0.8 3
23 Preston 5 1 0 4 -5 +0.8 3
24 Burnley 5 0 2 3 -6 -0.4 2

Calculated from our results data. “xG +/−” is expected goal difference — a positive number with a low league position suggests an undervalued team. Ties on points are sorted by goal difference; some leagues use other rules.

Match report

Birmingham Wolves
3′
⚽ Fer López 0–1
Rodrigo Gomes
1–1 Jay Stansfield ⚽
Patrick Roberts
22′
31′
⚽ Ladislav Krejčí 1–2
André
1–3 Jackson Tchatchoua ⚽
own goal
36′
Half-time 1–3
51′
🟨 Marshall Munetsi
Christoph·Klarer 🟨
53′
Phil Neumann 🟨
67′
68′
🔁 Jordan James
↦ Marshall Munetsi
68′
🔁 Mateus Mane
↦ Rodrigo Gomes
Demarai Gray 🔁
↦ Liam Millar
69′
76′
🔁 Thomas Doyle
↦ Raúl Jiménez
Marvin Ducksch 🔁
↦ Jay Stansfield
81′
Carlos Vicente 🔁
↦ Patrick Roberts
81′
Luis Vasquez 🔁
↦ August Priske
81′
87′
🔁 Sean Neave
↦ Adam Armstrong
87′
🔁 Boubacar Traore
↦ André
Ethan Laird 🔁
↦ Demarai Gray
92′
Full-time 1–3

Line-ups

Birmingham

4-2-3-1
1 J. Beadle G
26 B. Osayi-Samuel D
5 P. Neumann D
4 C. Klarer D
20 A. Cochrane D
24 T. Iwata M
8 Paik Seung-Ho M
16 P. Roberts M
28 J. Stansfield M
17 L. Millar M
9 A. Priske F
Bench (9)
33 M. Ducksch
25 K. Lund
21 R. Allsop
2 E. Laird
32 L. Vázquez
10 D. Gray
27 K. Fujimoto
23 D. Fry
7 Carlos Vicente

Coach: C. Davies

Wolves

4-2-3-1
1 José Sá G
38 J. Tchatchoua D
34 N. Djiga D
37 L. Krejčí D
3 Hugo Bueno D
7 André M
5 M. Munetsi M
21 Rodrigo Gomes M
28 Fer López M
10 A. Armstrong M
9 R. Jiménez F
Bench (9)
23 T. Chirewa
20 T. Doyle
8 J. James
33 G. Konan
36 M. Mane
14 S. Neave
24 Toti Gomes
12 B. Traoré
13 João Virgínia

Coach: César Peixoto

Odds comparison

Green columns are the outcomes that came in.

1X2
H
2,87
U ✓
3,24
B
2,41
Over/under goals
O1,5 ✓
1,30
U1,5
3,24
O2,5 ✓
2,06
U2,5
1,71
O3,5 ✓
3,18
U3,5
1,28
Both teams to score
BLS ja ✓
1,71
BLS nei
2,00

Referee

Adam Herczeg · 18 kamper i vår database

🟨 Yellow cards
4,0 / match
Above average
⚽ Free kicks
22,8 / match
Average

🟥 Red cards: 0,17 per match

The analysis is a statistical estimate based on the teams' results and underlying performances (xG) — not a guarantee. See the model's results.