← Match Finder
Premier League
Referee: D England
1–3
Full-time
Chelsea
T S T S S

Retrospective analysis — the model is trained only on matches played before this one.

🔒 Who wins? Pro

The model's probabilities for a home win, draw and away win — with reasoning and recommended markets.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Team trends

Crystal Palace Chelsea
Last 6 — all competitions · 6/6 matches
Win Ø 25%
0%
50%
Points per game
0,3
1,7
Over 2.5 Ø 42%
33%
50%
Both score Ø 59%
50%
67%
Average goals
1,8
3,2
Scored
0,5
2,0
Conceded
1,3
1,2
Goal diff per game
-0,8
+0,8
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
This season — Premier League · 22/22 matches
Win Ø 37%
32%
41%
Points per game
1,3
1,5
Over 2.5 Ø 52%
45%
59%
Both score Ø 52%
45%
59%
Average goals
2,2
2,7
Scored
1,0
1,6
Conceded
1,1
1,1
Goal diff per game
-0,1
+0,5
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
🔒 Goal markets Pro

Expected goals, over/under and both teams to score — priced by the model before kick-off.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

🔒 Most likely result Pro

The model's top final scores with the best bookmaker odds.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Match stats

Half-time score: 0–1

1,77 xG 2,20
43% Possession 57%
13 Shots 10
7 Shots on target 6
3 Blocked shots 1
2 Goalkeeper saves 5
4 Corners 5
2 Offside 1
11 Free kicks against 10
2 Yellow cards 2
1 Red cards 0
The table before the match Crystal Palace 15. · Chelsea 6.
# Team K V U T +/− xG +/− P
1 Arsenal 22 15 5 2 +26 +23.6 50
2 Man City 23 14 4 5 +26 +15.7 46
3 Aston Villa 22 13 4 5 +8 -4.0 43
4 Liverpool 23 10 6 7 +3 +9.9 36
5 Man United 22 9 8 5 +6 +13.2 35
6 Chelsea 22 9 7 6 +12 +7.7 34
7 Fulham 23 10 4 9 +0 -6.6 34
8 Brentford 22 10 3 9 +5 +6.0 33
9 Newcastle 22 9 6 7 +5 +8.6 33
10 Sunderland 23 8 9 6 -2 -12.6 33
11 Everton 22 9 5 8 -1 -8.0 32
12 Brighton 23 7 9 7 +2 +2.8 30
13 Bournemouth 23 7 9 7 -5 +3.1 30
14 Tottenham 23 7 7 9 +2 -6.9 28
15 Crystal Palace 22 7 7 8 -2 +4.8 28
16 Leeds 22 6 7 9 -7 +0.1 25
17 Nott'm Forest 22 6 4 12 -13 -6.6 22
18 West Ham 23 5 5 13 -18 -13.0 20
19 Burnley 23 3 6 14 -19 -27.2 15
20 Wolves 23 1 5 17 -28 -10.6 8

Calculated from our results data. “xG +/−” is expected goal difference — a positive number with a low league position suggests an undervalued team. Ties on points are sorted by goal difference; some leagues use other rules.

Match report

Crystal Palace Chelsea
20′
🟨 Moisés Caicedo
34′
Estevao 0–1
Half-time 0–2
50′
Joao Pedro 0–2
Estevao
60′
ℹ️ João Pedro
VAR: Penalty confirmed
Jaydee Canvot 🟨
63′
64′
E. Fernandez 0–3
B. Sosa 🔁
↦ T. Mitchell
65′
Y. Pino 🔁
↦ J. Canvot
65′
Adam Wharton 🟨
67′
Adam Wharton 🟨
72′
Adam Wharton 🟥
72′
73′
🔁 W. Fofana
↦ M. Caicedo
74′
🔁 M. Gusto
↦ P. Neto
74′
🔁 J. Gittens
↦ Estêvão
W. Hughes 🔁
↦ B. Johnson
76′
C. Riad 🔁
↦ D. Munoz
76′
81′
🔁 J. Hato
↦ R. James
C. Uche 🔁
↦ J. Mateta
85′
85′
🔁 L. Delap
↦ Joao Pedro
1–3 C. Richards
C. Riad
88′
Jefferson Lerma 🟨
90′
90′
🟨 Andrey Santos
Full-time 1–3

Line-ups

Crystal Palace

3-4-2-1
1 D. Henderson G
23 J. Canvot D
5 M. Lacroix D
26 C. Richards D
2 D. Munoz M
20 A. Wharton M
8 J. Lerma M
3 T. Mitchell M
7 I. Sarr F
11 B. Johnson F
14 J. Mateta F
Bench (9)
44 W. Benitez
19 W. Hughes
24 B. Sosa
30 D. Imray
42 K. Rodney
12 C. Uche
10 Y. Pino
55 J. Devenny
34 C. Riad

Coach: Oliver Glasner

Chelsea

4-2-3-1
1 R. Sanchez G
24 R. James D
23 T. Chalobah D
5 B. Badiashile D
3 M. Cucurella D
17 Andrey Santos M
25 M. Caicedo M
41 Estêvão M
8 E. Fernandez M
7 P. Neto M
20 Joao Pedro F
Bench (9)
28 T. Sharman-Lowe
29 W. Fofana
27 M. Gusto
11 J. Gittens
49 A. Garnacho
38 M. Guiu
9 L. Delap
21 J. Hato
34 J. Acheampong

Coach: Calum McFarlane

Odds comparison

Green columns are the outcomes that came in.

1X2
H
3,50
U
3,66
B ✓
2,00
Over/under goals
O1,5 ✓
O2,5 ✓
1,74
U2,5
2,04
O3,5 ✓
Both teams to score
BLS ja ✓
BLS nei

Referee

D England · 172 kamper i vår database

🟨 Yellow cards
3,9 / match
Above average
⚽ Free kicks
22,5 / match
Above average

🟥 Red cards: 0,11 per match

The analysis is a statistical estimate based on the teams' results and underlying performances (xG) — not a guarantee. See the model's results.