← Match Finder
Premier League
Referee: C Kavanagh
Liverpool
T S U S S
3–0
Full-time
Nott'm Forest
U T U U U

Retrospective analysis — the model is trained only on matches played before this one.

🔒 Who wins? Pro

The model's probabilities for a home win, draw and away win — with reasoning and recommended markets.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Team trends

Liverpool Nott'm Forest
Last 6 — all competitions · 6/6 matches
Win Ø 42%
67%
17%
Points per game
2,2
1,2
Over 2.5 Ø 42%
67%
17%
Both score Ø 59%
67%
50%
Average goals
3,5
1,8
Scored
2,5
0,8
Conceded
1,0
1,0
Goal diff per game
+1,5
-0,2
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
This season — Premier League · 9/9 matches
Win Ø 45%
67%
22%
Points per game
2,2
1,1
Over 2.5 Ø 61%
78%
44%
Both score Ø 73%
78%
67%
Average goals
3,2
2,4
Scored
2,2
1,1
Conceded
1,0
1,3
Goal diff per game
+1,2
-0,2
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
🔒 Goal markets Pro

Expected goals, over/under and both teams to score — priced by the model before kick-off.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

🔒 Most likely result Pro

The model's top final scores with the best bookmaker odds.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Match stats

Half-time score: 2–0

3,19 xG 0,45
73% Possession 27%
21 Shots 9
8 Shots on target 1
4 Blocked shots 4
1 Goalkeeper saves 5
8 Corners 3
1 Offside 3
9 Free kicks against 13
2 Yellow cards 3
0 Red cards 0
The table before the match Liverpool 4. · Nott'm Forest 15.
# Team K V U T +/− xG +/− P
1 Tottenham 10 8 2 0 +13 +5.0 26
2 Arsenal 10 7 3 0 +15 +10.9 24
3 Man City 9 7 0 2 +12 +9.7 21
4 Liverpool 9 6 2 1 +11 +7.5 20
5 Aston Villa 9 6 1 2 +10 +3.3 19
6 Newcastle 10 5 2 3 +15 +11.7 17
7 Brighton 9 5 1 3 +4 +2.6 16
8 Man United 9 5 0 4 -2 +0.2 15
9 West Ham 10 4 2 4 -1 -5.0 14
10 Brentford 10 3 4 3 +4 +6.5 13
11 Chelsea 10 3 3 4 +2 +7.1 12
12 Wolves 10 3 3 4 -4 -4.5 12
13 Crystal Palace 10 3 3 4 -5 -3.5 12
14 Fulham 9 3 2 4 -7 -7.5 11
15 Nott'm Forest 9 2 4 3 -2 -1.8 10
16 Everton 10 3 1 6 -4 +2.6 10
17 Bournemouth 10 1 3 6 -13 -11.2 6
18 Luton 9 1 2 6 -9 -6.4 5
19 Burnley 10 1 1 8 -17 -10.9 4
20 Sheffield United 10 0 1 9 -22 -16.2 1

Calculated from our results data. “xG +/−” is expected goal difference — a positive number with a low league position suggests an undervalued team. Ties on points are sorted by goal difference; some leagues use other rules.

Match report

Liverpool Nott'm Forest
Trent Alexander-Arnold 🟨
19′
1–0 Diogo Jota
31′
33′
🟨 Orel Mangala
2–0 D. Núñez
D. Szoboszlai
35′
Half-time 2–0
52′
🟨 Nicolás Domínguez
Alexis Mac Allister 🟨
58′
C. Gakpo 🔁
↦ Diogo Jota
58′
H. Elliott 🔁
↦ R. Gravenberch
58′
69′
🔁 R. Yates
↦ N. Domínguez
69′
🔁 T. Awoniyi
↦ W. Boly
69′
🔁 H. Toffolo
↦ O. Aina
3–0 Mohamed Salah
D. Szoboszlai
77′
W. Endo 🔁
↦ D. Núñez
80′
83′
🔁 Andrey Santos
↦ O. Mangala
83′
🔁 N. Williams
↦ M. Gibbs-White
J. Gomez 🔁
↦ T. Alexander-Arnold
89′
90′
🟨 Ibrahim Sangaré
Cody Gakpo ℹ️
VAR: Goal cancelled
94′
Full-time 3–0

Line-ups

Liverpool

4-3-3
1 Alisson Becker G
66 T. Alexander-Arnold D
5 I. Konaté D
4 V. van Dijk D
21 K. Tsimikas D
8 D. Szoboszlai M
10 A. Mac Allister M
38 R. Gravenberch M
11 Mohamed Salah F
9 D. Núñez F
20 Diogo Jota F
Bench (9)
18 C. Gakpo
19 H. Elliott
3 W. Endo
2 J. Gomez
13 Adrián
32 J. Matip
53 J. McConnell
44 L. Chambers
62 C. Kelleher

Coach: J. Klopp

Nott'm Forest

5-4-1
1 M. Turner G
24 S. Aurier D
30 W. Boly D
19 M. Niakhaté D
40 Murillo D
43 O. Aina D
10 M. Gibbs-White M
5 O. Mangala M
6 I. Sangaré M
16 N. Domínguez M
21 A. Elanga F
Bench (9)
22 R. Yates
9 T. Awoniyi
15 H. Toffolo
12 Andrey Santos
7 N. Williams
8 C. Kouyaté
23 O. Vlachodimos
4 J. Worrall
3 Nuno Tavares

Coach: S. Cooper

Odds comparison

Green columns are the outcomes that came in.

1X2
H ✓
1,27
U
6,38
B
10,39
Over/under goals
O1,5 ✓
O2,5 ✓
1,41
U2,5
2,91
U3,5 ✓
Both teams to score
BLS ja
BLS nei ✓

Referee

C Kavanagh · 171 kamper i vår database

🟨 Yellow cards
3,8 / match
Above average
⚽ Free kicks
21,9 / match
Above average

🟥 Red cards: 0,16 per match

The analysis is a statistical estimate based on the teams' results and underlying performances (xG) — not a guarantee. See the model's results.