← Match Finder
Premier League
Referee: S Barrott
Nott'm Forest
S U T U U
2–2
Full-time
Luton
U T S T T

Retrospective analysis — the model is trained only on matches played before this one.

⚠️ One of the teams has played few league matches recently (e.g. newly promoted). The analysis is therefore more uncertain than usual, and we give no recommendations for this match.
🔒 Who wins? Pro

The model's probabilities for a home win, draw and away win — with reasoning and recommended markets.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Team trends

Nott'm Forest Luton
Last 6 — all competitions · 6/6 matches
Win Ø 17%
17%
17%
Points per game
1,0
0,7
Over 2.5 Ø 17%
0%
33%
Both score Ø 42%
33%
50%
Average goals
1,3
1,8
Scored
0,5
0,7
Conceded
0,8
1,2
Goal diff per game
-0,3
-0,5
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
This season — Premier League · 8/8 matches
Win Ø 19%
25%
13%
Points per game
1,1
0,5
Over 2.5 Ø 51%
38%
63%
Both score Ø 63%
63%
63%
Average goals
2,3
2,6
Scored
1,0
0,8
Conceded
1,3
1,9
Goal diff per game
-0,3
-1,1
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
🔒 Goal markets Pro

Expected goals, over/under and both teams to score — priced by the model before kick-off.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

🔒 Most likely result Pro

The model's top final scores with the best bookmaker odds.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Match stats

Half-time score: 0–0

2,97 xG 1,71
57% Possession 43%
19 Shots 13
8 Shots on target 4
2 Blocked shots 4
2 Goalkeeper saves 6
4 Corners 2
2 Offside 0
12 Free kicks against 11
3 Yellow cards 0
0 Red cards 0
The table before the match Nott'm Forest 13. · Luton 17.
# Team K V U T +/− xG +/− P
1 Liverpool 9 6 2 1 +11 +7.5 20
2 Tottenham 8 6 2 0 +10 +4.0 20
3 Arsenal 8 6 2 0 +10 +8.6 20
4 Man City 8 6 0 2 +11 +9.8 18
5 Aston Villa 8 5 1 2 +7 +2.5 16
6 Brighton 8 5 1 2 +5 +2.5 16
7 West Ham 8 4 2 2 +3 -4.1 14
8 Newcastle 8 4 1 3 +11 +9.2 13
9 Crystal Palace 8 3 3 2 +0 -1.8 12
10 Man United 8 4 0 4 -3 +0.5 12
11 Chelsea 8 3 2 3 +4 +6.9 11
12 Fulham 8 3 2 3 -5 -7.0 11
13 Nott'm Forest 8 2 3 3 -2 -3.0 9
14 Wolves 8 2 2 4 -5 -4.9 8
15 Brentford 8 1 4 3 -1 +4.3 7
16 Everton 9 2 1 6 -5 +2.4 7
17 Luton 8 1 1 6 -9 -5.2 4
18 Burnley 8 1 1 6 -13 -8.5 4
19 Bournemouth 8 0 3 5 -13 -9.8 3
20 Sheffield United 8 0 1 7 -16 -13.8 1

Calculated from our results data. “xG +/−” is expected goal difference — a positive number with a low league position suggests an undervalued team. Ties on points are sorted by goal difference; some leagues use other rules.

Match report

Nott'm Forest Luton
Half-time 1–0
1–0 C. Wood
A. Elanga
48′
55′
🔁 I. Kaboré
↦ R. Burke
Ibrahim Sangaré 🟨
60′
72′
🔁 A. Townsend
↦ T. Chong
72′
🔁 R. Barkley
↦ P. Mpanzu
72′
🔁 E. Adebayo
↦ J. Brown
2–0 C. Wood
A. Elanga
76′
C. Kouyaté 🔁
↦ I. Sangaré
78′
J. Worrall 🔁
↦ W. Boly
78′
R. Yates 🔁
↦ N. Domínguez
78′
81′
🔁 C. Woodrow
↦ C. Morris
Morgan Gibbs-White 🟨
82′
83′
C. Ogbene 2–1
N. Williams 🔁
↦ A. Elanga
88′
O. Aina 🔁
↦ S. Aurier
88′
92′
E. Adebayo 2–2
T. Lockyer
Murillo 🟨
98′
Full-time 2–2

Line-ups

Nott'm Forest

4-3-3
1 M. Turner G
24 S. Aurier D
30 W. Boly D
40 Murillo D
15 H. Toffolo D
16 N. Domínguez M
5 O. Mangala M
6 I. Sangaré M
10 M. Gibbs-White F
11 C. Wood F
21 A. Elanga F
Bench (9)
8 C. Kouyaté
4 J. Worrall
22 R. Yates
7 N. Williams
43 O. Aina
23 O. Vlachodimos
12 Andrey Santos
41 B. Aguilera
19 M. Niakhaté

Coach: S. Cooper

Luton

4-4-2
24 T. Kaminski G
16 R. Burke D
4 T. Lockyer D
15 T. Mengi D
45 A. Doughty D
7 C. Ogbene M
13 M. Nakamba M
17 P. Mpanzu M
14 T. Chong M
19 J. Brown F
9 C. Morris F
Bench (9)
12 I. Kaboré
30 A. Townsend
6 R. Barkley
11 E. Adebayo
10 C. Woodrow
26 R. Giles
47 J. Luker
23 T. Krul
2 G. Osho

Coach: R. Edwards

Odds comparison

Green columns are the outcomes that came in.

1X2
H
1,69
U ✓
3,82
B
5,33
Over/under goals
O1,5 ✓
O2,5 ✓
2,03
U2,5
1,80
O3,5 ✓
Both teams to score
BLS ja ✓
BLS nei

Referee

S Barrott · 111 kamper i vår database

🟨 Yellow cards
3,5 / match
Average
⚽ Free kicks
20,4 / match
Average

🟥 Red cards: 0,06 per match

The analysis is a statistical estimate based on the teams' results and underlying performances (xG) — not a guarantee. See the model's results.