← Match Finder
Premier League
Referee: D England
Man United
S U S S T
2–3
Full-time
Nott'm Forest
S T T S T

Retrospective analysis — the model is trained only on matches played before this one.

🔒 Who wins? Pro

The model's probabilities for a home win, draw and away win — with reasoning and recommended markets.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Team trends

Man United Nott'm Forest
Last 6 — all competitions · 6/6 matches
Win Ø 59%
67%
50%
Points per game
2,2
1,5
Over 2.5 Ø 67%
50%
83%
Both score Ø 33%
33%
33%
Average goals
3,0
3,0
Scored
2,2
1,3
Conceded
0,8
1,7
Goal diff per game
+1,3
-0,3
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
This season — Premier League · 14/14 matches
Win Ø 40%
36%
43%
Points per game
1,4
1,6
Over 2.5 Ø 50%
57%
43%
Both score Ø 40%
36%
43%
Average goals
2,3
2,3
Scored
1,2
1,1
Conceded
1,1
1,1
Goal diff per game
+0,1
+0,0
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
🔒 Goal markets Pro

Expected goals, over/under and both teams to score — priced by the model before kick-off.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

🔒 Most likely result Pro

The model's top final scores with the best bookmaker odds.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Match stats

Half-time score: 1–1

1,60 xG 0,83
71% Possession 29%
17 Shots 11
7 Shots on target 3
5 Blocked shots 4
0 Goalkeeper saves 5
5 Corners 3
0 Offside 1
10 Free kicks against 13
0 Yellow cards 2
0 Red cards 0
The table before the match Man United 13. · Nott'm Forest 9.
# Team K V U T +/− xG +/− P
1 Liverpool 14 11 2 1 +18 +15.7 35
2 Chelsea 14 8 4 2 +16 +10.7 28
3 Arsenal 14 8 4 2 +14 +10.0 28
4 Man City 15 8 3 4 +6 +7.5 27
5 Aston Villa 15 7 4 4 +0 +8.0 25
6 Brentford 15 7 2 6 +3 -2.0 23
7 Brighton 14 6 5 3 +3 -1.1 23
8 Fulham 14 6 4 4 +2 +4.1 22
9 Nott'm Forest 14 6 4 4 +0 +1.9 22
10 Bournemouth 14 6 3 5 +2 +10.5 21
11 Tottenham 14 6 2 6 +13 +5.2 20
12 Newcastle 15 5 5 5 -2 +1.2 20
13 Man United 14 5 4 5 +2 -1.8 19
14 West Ham 14 4 3 7 -9 -4.1 15
15 Everton 14 3 5 6 -7 -3.9 14
16 Crystal Palace 15 2 7 6 -6 -1.5 13
17 Leicester 14 3 4 7 -9 -14.0 13
18 Ipswich 14 1 6 7 -12 -15.9 9
19 Wolves 14 2 3 9 -14 -11.2 9
20 Southampton 15 1 2 12 -20 -19.3 5

Calculated from our results data. “xG +/−” is expected goal difference — a positive number with a low league position suggests an undervalued team. Ties on points are sorted by goal difference; some leagues use other rules.

Match report

Man United Nott'm Forest
2′
N. Milenković 0–1
E. Anderson
1–1 R. Højlund
18′
31′
🟨 Jota Silva
Half-time 1–2
47′
M. Gibbs-White 1–2
C. Hudson-Odoi
54′
C. Wood 1–3
M. Gibbs-White
M. Rashford 🔁
↦ A. Garnacho
59′
2–3 Bruno Fernandes
A. Diallo
61′
H. Maguire 🔁
↦ M. de Ligt
65′
N. Mazraoui 🔁
↦ L. Yoro
66′
68′
🔁 Morato
↦ Jota Silva
J. Zirkzee 🔁
↦ M. Ugarte
76′
M. Mount 🔁
↦ Bruno Fernandes
76′
79′
🔁 N. Domínguez
↦ M. Gibbs-White
79′
🔁 A. Elanga
↦ C. Wood
90′
🔁 T. Awoniyi
↦ C. Hudson-Odoi
94′
🟨 Neco Williams
Full-time 2–3

Line-ups

Man United

3-4-2-1
24 A. Onana G
15 L. Yoro D
4 M. de Ligt D
6 Lisandro Martínez D
16 A. Diallo M
37 K. Mainoo M
25 M. Ugarte M
20 Diogo Dalot M
8 Bruno Fernandes F
17 A. Garnacho F
9 R. Højlund F
Bench (9)
10 M. Rashford
5 H. Maguire
3 N. Mazraoui
11 J. Zirkzee
7 M. Mount
12 T. Malacia
14 C. Eriksen
1 A. Bayındır
18 Casemiro

Coach: Ruben Amorim

Nott'm Forest

4-2-3-1
26 M. Sels G
34 O. Aina D
31 N. Milenković D
5 Murillo D
7 N. Williams D
8 E. Anderson M
22 R. Yates M
20 Jota Silva M
10 M. Gibbs-White M
14 C. Hudson-Odoi M
11 C. Wood F
Bench (9)
4 Morato
16 N. Domínguez
21 A. Elanga
9 T. Awoniyi
30 W. Boly
24 R. Sosa
33 Carlos Miguel
15 H. Toffolo
18 J. Ward-Prowse

Coach: Nuno Espírito Santo

Odds comparison

Green columns are the outcomes that came in.

1X2
H
1,67
U
4,05
B ✓
5,12
Over/under goals
O1,5 ✓
O2,5 ✓
1,79
U2,5
2,05
O3,5 ✓
Both teams to score
BLS ja ✓
BLS nei

Referee

D England · 172 kamper i vår database

🟨 Yellow cards
3,9 / match
Above average
⚽ Free kicks
22,5 / match
Above average

🟥 Red cards: 0,11 per match

The analysis is a statistical estimate based on the teams' results and underlying performances (xG) — not a guarantee. See the model's results.