← Match Finder
Premier League
Referee: C Pawson
Nott'm Forest
S T S S S
1–0
Full-time
Tottenham
T U S S T

Retrospective analysis — the model is trained only on matches played before this one.

🔒 Who wins? Pro

The model's probabilities for a home win, draw and away win — with reasoning and recommended markets.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Team trends

Nott'm Forest Tottenham
Last 6 — all competitions · 6/6 matches
Win Ø 50%
67%
33%
Points per game
2,0
1,2
Over 2.5 Ø 67%
67%
67%
Both score Ø 50%
33%
67%
Average goals
2,8
5,2
Scored
1,3
2,7
Conceded
1,5
2,5
Goal diff per game
-0,2
+0,2
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
This season — Premier League · 17/17 matches
Win Ø 47%
53%
41%
Points per game
1,8
1,4
Over 2.5 Ø 59%
47%
71%
Both score Ø 53%
47%
59%
Average goals
2,5
3,8
Scored
1,4
2,3
Conceded
1,1
1,5
Goal diff per game
+0,2
+0,8
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
🔒 Goal markets Pro

Expected goals, over/under and both teams to score — priced by the model before kick-off.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

🔒 Most likely result Pro

The model's top final scores with the best bookmaker odds.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Match stats

Half-time score: 1–0

1,12 xG 0,90
30% Possession 70%
10 Shots 13
3 Shots on target 4
2 Blocked shots 5
4 Goalkeeper saves 2
2 Corners 7
4 Offside 1
12 Free kicks against 13
3 Yellow cards 2
0 Red cards 1
The table before the match Nott'm Forest 4. · Tottenham 11.
# Team K V U T +/− xG +/− P
1 Liverpool 16 12 3 1 +21 +21.0 39
2 Chelsea 17 10 5 2 +18 +11.4 35
3 Arsenal 17 9 6 2 +18 +14.3 33
4 Nott'm Forest 17 9 4 4 +4 +2.7 31
5 Bournemouth 17 8 4 5 +6 +11.8 28
6 Man City 18 8 4 6 +4 +7.2 28
7 Aston Villa 17 8 4 5 +0 +7.3 28
8 Newcastle 17 7 5 5 +6 +6.4 26
9 Fulham 17 6 7 4 +2 +2.0 25
10 Brighton 17 6 7 4 +1 -2.5 25
11 Tottenham 17 7 2 8 +14 +2.5 23
12 Brentford 17 7 2 8 +0 -2.8 23
13 Man United 17 6 4 7 -1 +0.7 22
14 West Ham 17 5 5 7 -8 -4.2 20
15 Everton 17 3 8 6 -7 -6.6 17
16 Crystal Palace 17 3 7 7 -8 -1.5 16
17 Leicester 17 3 5 9 -16 -18.2 14
18 Wolves 17 3 3 11 -13 -10.3 12
19 Ipswich 17 2 6 9 -16 -19.5 12
20 Southampton 17 1 3 13 -25 -21.5 6

Calculated from our results data. “xG +/−” is expected goal difference — a positive number with a low league position suggests an undervalued team. Ties on points are sorted by goal difference; some leagues use other rules.

Match report

Nott'm Forest Tottenham
Ryan Yates 🟨
10′
1–0 A. Elanga
M. Gibbs-White
28′
Elliot Anderson 🟨
45′
Half-time 1–0
49′
🟨 Radu Drăguşin
64′
🔁 L. Bergvall
↦ R. Bentancur
64′
🔁 J. Maddison
↦ P. Sarr
Murillo 🟨
65′
Morato 🔁
↦ A. Elanga
74′
75′
🟨 Djed Spence
77′
🟨 James Maddison
81′
🔁 T. Werner
↦ Son Heung-Min
81′
🔁 Pedro Porro
↦ D. Udogie
J. Ward-Prowse 🔁
↦ E. Anderson
82′
Jota Silva 🔁
↦ M. Gibbs-White
82′
R. Sosa 🔁
↦ C. Hudson-Odoi
87′
T. Awoniyi 🔁
↦ C. Wood
87′
87′
🔁 Y. Bissouma
↦ R. Drăgușin
94′
🟨 Djed Spence
94′
🟥 Djed Spence
Full-time 1–0

Line-ups

Nott'm Forest

4-2-3-1
26 M. Sels G
34 O. Aina D
31 N. Milenković D
5 Murillo D
7 N. Williams D
22 R. Yates M
8 E. Anderson M
21 A. Elanga M
10 M. Gibbs-White M
14 C. Hudson-Odoi M
11 C. Wood F
Bench (9)
4 Morato
18 J. Ward-Prowse
20 Jota Silva
24 R. Sosa
9 T. Awoniyi
33 Carlos Miguel
15 H. Toffolo
19 Álex Moreno
30 W. Boly

Coach: Nuno Espírito Santo

Tottenham

4-2-3-1
20 F. Forster G
24 D. Spence D
6 R. Drăgușin D
14 A. Gray D
13 D. Udogie D
30 R. Bentancur M
29 P. Sarr M
22 B. Johnson M
21 D. Kulusevski M
7 Son Heung-Min M
19 D. Solanke F
Bench (9)
15 L. Bergvall
10 J. Maddison
16 T. Werner
23 Pedro Porro
8 Y. Bissouma
64 C. Olusesi
3 Sergio Reguilón
40 B. Austin
42 W. Lankshear

Coach: A. Postecoglou

Odds comparison

Green columns are the outcomes that came in.

1X2
H ✓
2,35
U
3,74
B
2,82
Over/under goals
U1,5 ✓
O2,5
1,48
U2,5 ✓
2,64
U3,5 ✓
Both teams to score
BLS ja
BLS nei ✓

Referee

C Pawson · 173 kamper i vår database

🟨 Yellow cards
3,8 / match
Average
⚽ Free kicks
22,7 / match
Above average

🟥 Red cards: 0,12 per match

The analysis is a statistical estimate based on the teams' results and underlying performances (xG) — not a guarantee. See the model's results.