← Match Finder
Premier League
Referee: D England
Wolves
S T T T T
2–6
Full-time
Chelsea
S S S T S

Retrospective analysis — the model is trained only on matches played before this one.

🔒 Who wins? Pro

The model's probabilities for a home win, draw and away win — with reasoning and recommended markets.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Team trends

Wolves Chelsea
Last 6 — all competitions · 6/6 matches
Win Ø 50%
17%
83%
Points per game
0,5
2,5
Over 2.5 Ø 59%
50%
67%
Both score Ø 50%
50%
50%
Average goals
3,0
3,3
Scored
0,7
2,3
Conceded
2,3
1,0
Goal diff per game
-1,7
+1,3
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
This season — Premier League · 1/1 matches
Win Ø 0%
0%
0%
Points per game
0,0
0,0
Over 2.5 Ø 0%
0%
0%
Both score Ø 0%
0%
0%
Average goals
2,0
2,0
Scored
0,0
0,0
Conceded
2,0
2,0
Goal diff per game
-2,0
-2,0
🔒 Goal markets Pro

Expected goals, over/under and both teams to score — priced by the model before kick-off.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

🔒 Most likely result Pro

The model's top final scores with the best bookmaker odds.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Match stats

Half-time score: 2–2

1,96 xG 1,68
40% Possession 60%
12 Shots 14
4 Shots on target 8
2 Blocked shots 3
2 Goalkeeper saves 2
5 Corners 5
3 Offside 1
13 Free kicks against 13
2 Yellow cards 3
0 Red cards 0
The table before the match Wolves 16. · Chelsea 17.
# Team K V U T +/− xG +/− P
1 Man City 2 2 0 0 +5 +2.8 6
2 Brighton 2 2 0 0 +4 +1.6 6
3 Arsenal 2 2 0 0 +4 +0.4 6
4 Tottenham 2 1 1 0 +4 +1.6 4
5 Nott'm Forest 2 1 1 0 +1 +2.4 4
6 Liverpool 1 1 0 0 +2 +2.2 3
7 West Ham 2 1 0 1 +1 +0.5 3
8 Brentford 1 1 0 0 +1 +0.4 3
9 Newcastle 1 1 0 0 +1 -1.5 3
10 Man United 2 1 0 1 +0 +1.3 3
11 Fulham 2 1 0 1 +0 -0.8 3
12 Aston Villa 2 1 0 1 -1 -0.0 3
13 Bournemouth 1 0 1 0 +0 -0.1 1
14 Leicester 2 0 1 1 -1 -1.3 1
15 Southampton 2 0 0 2 -2 -0.8 0
16 Wolves 1 0 0 1 -2 -0.8 0
17 Chelsea 1 0 0 1 -2 +0.2 0
18 Crystal Palace 2 0 0 2 -3 -0.5 0
19 Ipswich 2 0 0 2 -5 -5.2 0
20 Everton 2 0 0 2 -7 -2.4 0

Calculated from our results data. “xG +/−” is expected goal difference — a positive number with a low league position suggests an undervalued team. Ties on points are sorted by goal difference; some leagues use other rules.

Match report

Wolves Chelsea
2′
N. Jackson 0–1
1–1 Matheus Cunha
R. Aït-Nouri
27′
Rayan Aït Nouri 🟨
35′
40′
🟨 Malo Gusto
44′
🟨 Cole Palmer
45′
C. Palmer 1–2
N. Jackson
Half-time 1–2
46′
🔁 Pedro Neto
↦ M. Mudryk
49′
N. Madueke 1–3
C. Palmer
2–3 J. Strand Larsen
Toti Gomes
51′
58′
N. Madueke 2–4
C. Palmer
Daniel Podence 🔁
↦ Hwang Hee-Chan
59′
63′
N. Madueke 2–5
C. Palmer
Pablo Sarabia 🔁
↦ Matheus Cunha
68′
C. Dawson 🔁
↦ R. Aït-Nouri
68′
Rodrigo Gomes 🔁
↦ J. Bellegarde
68′
68′
🔁 João Félix
↦ N. Jackson
Yerson Mosquera 🟨
71′
71′
🟨 Marc Cucurella
76′
🔁 K. Dewsbury-Hall
↦ M. Caicedo
80′
João Félix 2–6
Pedro Neto
82′
🔁 Renato Veiga
↦ Marc Cucurella
82′
🔁 C. Nkunku
↦ C. Palmer
T. Doyle 🔁
↦ M. Lemina
90′
Full-time 2–6

Line-ups

Wolves

4-2-3-1
1 José Sá G
2 M. Doherty D
14 Y. Mosquera D
24 Toti Gomes D
3 R. Aït-Nouri D
8 João Gomes M
5 M. Lemina M
11 Hwang Hee-Chan M
12 Matheus Cunha M
27 J. Bellegarde M
9 J. Strand Larsen F
Bench (9)
10 Daniel Podence
21 Pablo Sarabia
15 C. Dawson
19 Rodrigo Gomes
20 T. Doyle
6 B. Traoré
29 Gonçalo Guedes
25 D. Bentley
4 S. Bueno

Coach: G. O'Neil

Chelsea

4-2-3-1
1 Robert Sánchez G
27 M. Gusto D
29 W. Fofana D
6 L. Colwill D
3 Marc Cucurella D
25 M. Caicedo M
8 Enzo Fernández M
11 N. Madueke M
20 C. Palmer M
10 M. Mudryk M
15 N. Jackson F
Bench (9)
7 Pedro Neto
14 João Félix
22 K. Dewsbury-Hall
40 Renato Veiga
18 C. Nkunku
12 F. Jørgensen
5 B. Badiashile
4 T. Adarabioyo
38 Marc Guiu

Coach: E. Maresca

Odds comparison

Green columns are the outcomes that came in.

1X2
H
4,37
U
4,00
B ✓
1,77
Over/under goals
O1,5 ✓
O2,5 ✓
1,64
U2,5
2,29
O3,5 ✓
Both teams to score
BLS ja ✓
BLS nei

Referee

D England · 172 kamper i vår database

🟨 Yellow cards
3,9 / match
Above average
⚽ Free kicks
22,5 / match
Above average

🟥 Red cards: 0,11 per match

The analysis is a statistical estimate based on the teams' results and underlying performances (xG) — not a guarantee. See the model's results.