← Match Finder
Premier League
Referee: C Kavanagh
Nott'm Forest
U T U T T
1–1
Full-time
Wolves
U T S T T

Retrospective analysis — the model is trained only on matches played before this one.

🔒 Who wins? Pro

The model's probabilities for a home win, draw and away win — with reasoning and recommended markets.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Team trends

Nott'm Forest Wolves
Last 6 — all competitions · 6/6 matches
Win Ø 9%
0%
17%
Points per game
0,3
0,7
Over 2.5 Ø 50%
67%
33%
Both score Ø 59%
67%
50%
Average goals
3,2
2,5
Scored
0,8
0,8
Conceded
2,3
1,7
Goal diff per game
-1,5
-0,8
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
This season — Premier League · 27/28 matches
Win Ø 24%
22%
25%
Points per game
1,0
1,0
Over 2.5 Ø 42%
41%
43%
Both score Ø 40%
41%
39%
Average goals
2,6
2,3
Scored
0,8
0,8
Conceded
1,8
1,5
Goal diff per game
-1,0
-0,7
xG created Pro
xG conceded Pro
xG diff Pro
🔒 Goal markets Pro

Expected goals, over/under and both teams to score — priced by the model before kick-off.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

🔒 Most likely result Pro

The model's top final scores with the best bookmaker odds.

Unlock with Pro

Already have an account? Log in

Match stats

Half-time score: 1–0

1,32 xG 0,49
28% Possession 72%
17 Shots 8
7 Shots on target 1
3 Blocked shots 4
0 Goalkeeper saves 6
4 Corners 3
2 Offside 0
14 Free kicks against 13
3 Yellow cards 5
0 Red cards 0
The table before the match Nott'm Forest 16. · Wolves 13.
# Team K V U T +/− xG +/− P
1 Arsenal 28 22 3 3 +40 +9.6 69
2 Man City 28 20 4 4 +45 +14.7 64
3 Man United 26 15 5 6 +6 +0.7 50
4 Tottenham 28 15 4 9 +12 +0.5 49
5 Newcastle 26 12 11 3 +20 +2.8 47
6 Liverpool 27 12 6 9 +15 +3.6 42
7 Brighton 25 12 6 7 +15 +8.8 42
8 Brentford 27 10 12 5 +9 +4.1 42
9 Fulham 27 11 6 10 +1 -4.1 39
10 Chelsea 27 10 8 9 +1 +2.0 38
11 Aston Villa 27 11 5 11 -4 -3.0 38
12 Crystal Palace 28 6 9 13 -16 -7.7 27
13 Wolves 28 7 6 15 -19 -3.6 27
14 Leeds 27 6 8 13 -9 -2.3 26
15 Everton 28 6 8 14 -18 -5.0 26
16 Nott'm Forest 27 6 8 13 -27 -8.1 26
17 Leicester 27 7 4 16 -9 -1.2 25
18 West Ham 26 6 6 14 -10 +0.4 24
19 Bournemouth 27 6 6 15 -29 -7.0 24
20 Southampton 28 6 5 17 -23 -4.9 23

Calculated from our results data. “xG +/−” is expected goal difference — a positive number with a low league position suggests an undervalued team. Ties on points are sorted by goal difference; some leagues use other rules.

Match report

Nott'm Forest Wolves
Remo Freuler 🟨
35′
1–0 B. Johnson
Danilo
38′
Brennan Johnson 🟨
40′
42′
🟨 Rúben Neves
45′
🟨 João Moutinho
Half-time 1–0
46′
🔁 Daniel Podence
↦ João Moutinho
46′
🔁 Pablo Sarabia
↦ M. Lemina
Harry Toffolo 🟨
49′
Renan Lodi 🔁
↦ H. Toffolo
61′
65′
🔁 Hugo Bueno
↦ C. Dawson
65′
🔁 Diego Costa
↦ Adama Traoré
J. Worrall 🔁
↦ E. Dennis
67′
78′
🟨 Nélson Semedo
81′
🔁 Pedro Neto
↦ Matheus Cunha
83′
Daniel Podence 1–1
85′
🟨 Pablo Sarabia
T. Awoniyi 🔁
↦ Danilo
86′
C. Kouyaté 🔁
↦ O. Mangala
86′
91′
ℹ️ Daniel Podence
VAR: Card reviewed
93′
🟨 Toti Gomes
Full-time 1–1

Line-ups

Nott'm Forest

4-3-2-1
12 K. Navas G
7 N. Williams D
38 Felipe D
19 M. Niakhaté D
15 H. Toffolo D
5 O. Mangala M
23 R. Freuler M
28 Danilo M
20 B. Johnson M
25 E. Dennis M
10 M. Gibbs-White F
Bench (9)
32 Renan Lodi
4 J. Worrall
9 T. Awoniyi
21 C. Kouyaté
13 W. Hennessey
6 J. Shelvey
16 S. Surridge
8 J. Colback
34 A. Ayew

Coach: S. Cooper

Wolves

4-2-3-1
1 José Sá G
22 Nélson Semedo D
15 C. Dawson D
23 M. Kilman D
24 Toti D
8 Rúben Neves M
5 M. Lemina M
37 Adama Traoré M
28 João Moutinho M
27 Matheus Nunes M
12 Matheus Cunha F
Bench (9)
10 Daniel Podence
21 Pablo Sarabia
64 Hugo Bueno
29 Diego Costa
7 Pedro Neto
4 N. Collins
35 João Gomes
9 R. Jiménez
25 D. Bentley

Coach: Lopetegui

Odds comparison

Green columns are the outcomes that came in.

1X2
H
2,96
U ✓
3,13
B
2,61
Over/under goals
O1,5 ✓
O2,5
2,38
U2,5 ✓
1,59
U3,5 ✓
Both teams to score
BLS ja ✓
BLS nei

Referee

C Kavanagh · 171 kamper i vår database

🟨 Yellow cards
3,8 / match
Above average
⚽ Free kicks
21,9 / match
Above average

🟥 Red cards: 0,16 per match

The analysis is a statistical estimate based on the teams' results and underlying performances (xG) — not a guarantee. See the model's results.